Because we need more innovative school leaders leading the way in teaching, learning and leading
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
The Equity Project and Emphasis on Teacher Observation and Collaboration
The following text, which outlines the TEP plan, is taken directly from the TEP website:
While an interdisciplinary curriculum is a theoretical ideal, the structural reality of many schools precludes the collaboration required for interdisciplinary teaching and learning to take place. In contrast, TEP’s school structure specifically creates and reinforces a collaborative culture in several key ways: (a) The annual 6-week Summer Development Institute lays the foundation for interdisciplinary teaching as teachers collaborate in planning specific curricular changes and designing Academic Support Plans for failing students. (b) TEP’s teacher schedule has been specially designed such that every TEP teacher spends at least three periods per day observing, being observed, and debriefing/planning with a partner teacher (teacher pairs rotate each quarter). This unique structural feature provides built-in time for teachers to plan and implement interdisciplinary units with one another.
The brilliance, for me, in the TEP schedule lies in item (b): "every TEP teacher spends at least three periods per day observing, being observed, and debriefing/planning with a partner teacher (teacher pairs rotate each quarter)." Who better to observe to improve one's own pedagogy than master teachers? Who better to observe teachers and provide feedback on pedagogy than master teachers? Peer observation creates a non-threatening win-win situation for teachers. Regardless of whether the observer and the active teacher specialize in the same academic field or not, teachers can learn from one another when provided the opportunity by educational leaders to spend time in each other's classrooms. In many districts and at many schools, teachers rarely have the opportunity to leave their own classroom to observe other teachers. Likewise, in many districts and schools, leadership rarely encourages such interaction between educators. Kudos to to The Equity Project for not only understanding the value of such an exercise but also for making a quantifiable commitment to the exercise by building time into the schedule for observation and collaboration.
Friday, June 19, 2009
The Equity Project and its Rigorous Qualifications for Prospective Teacher Hires
As I mentioned in the last blog post, The Equity Project will be staffing its school with what it considers the best group of teachers money can buy. The Equity Project puts its money where its mouth is by paying its teachers $125,000 annually. This statement begs the question, "How does one find a teacher worthy of $125,000 per year?" Let's look at The Equity Project's answer.
The Equity Project believes the key to a successful school hinges on having the best teachers in the classrooms. To find the best teachers, by TEP standards, The Equity Project launched a national search. To be considered for a position with The Equity Project, teachers had to meet the following "Rigorous Qualifications." The text below in italics came directly from the TEP website. My comments follow the italicized sections below.
(1) Expert Subject-Area Knowledge demonstrated through
- (a) undergraduate and/or graduate coursework and excellent grades in the relevant subject area
- (b) an original piece of writing on any topic in the subject-area
- (c) a written analysis of a pedagogical issue related to the subject area
Item a makes a great deal of sense to me. I received a number of applications from candidates this year who had Cs, Ds, Fs and Ws (withdraw) on their transcript in their subject area. Needless to say, those candidates probably still are looking for a job. I love the idea of items b and c. These at least partially demonstrate the extent to which a teacher has pondered and considered a topic or issue in his/her subject area. I want thinkers on my team.
(2) Teaching Expertise and Experience demonstrated through
- (a) the submission of TWO of the following three items
- (i) an unedited video clip of a lesson, accompanied by a written narrative that analyzes and reflects upon the teaching and learning that occurs in the lesson
- (ii)a portfolio of student work that demonstrates the progress of 2 specific students, accompanied by a written narrative that analyzes the progress that each student demonstrates
- (iii) assessment data for at least one entire class of students accompanied by a written narrative that provides background on the assessments and analyzes the data
(b) the submission of one additional piece of evidence of any form demonstrating student learning - (c) an essay describing personal pedagogical beliefs and approach
- (d) a day-long teaching audition (either in the candidate’s classroom or in a TEP classroom)
(3) Strong Curriculum Development Ability demonstrated through
- (a) one originally developed and refined curricular tool of any form (e.g. written materials, instructional methodology, technological innovation)
(4) Outstanding Verbal Ability demonstrated through
- (a) the quality of the written work submitted in the application
- (b) communication skills demonstrated in the day-long teaching audition
When I receive poorly written cover letters I usually dismiss the entire submission. I believe item (a) carries a great deal of weight. Item (b), as I already stated, is a mixed bag for me. I certainly would be in favor of observing a candidate in his/her own environment as opposed to an audition in my school. Of course my students will behave perfectly and get into a lesson if there is a guest teacher being observed by a host of administrators. In the candidate's own classroom, however, a keen observer should be able to discern to what extent the teacher is conducting business as usual or is putting on a show. The reality of this idea, however, lies in the issue of what administrator at another school would allow one of the school's best teachers to be observed by another school hoping to cherrypick that teacher.
All italicized text above taken from The Equity Project page on Rigorous Qualifications.
While the Rigorous Qualifications for The Equity Project may or may not line up exactly with the hiring process you use in your school, it does provide educational leaders with a nice framework for the hiring process. One certainly could do worse than using the TEP Rigorous Qualifications as a model for hiring teachers. It certainly has given me some ideas about raising the bar for applicants next year.
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
$125K-per-year Teacher Salaries - Intrigued Yet?
The article highlights a new charter school in New York called The Equity Project. The school, a middle school of just under 500 students, plans to open its doors in September of 2009. The school's philosophy centers on the idea that quality teaching represents the key to success in schools. And, yes, the teachers there really will make $125,000 per year. If you're wondering what a $125K-teacher looks like, you're not alone. I wondered the same thing until I read the article and then spent a significant amount of time on The Equity Project website. I recommend reading the article and browsing The Equity Project website.
I found a number of things about The Equity Project fascinating: the emphasis on teacher quality, the recruitment/hiring process and the emphasis on teacher observation and collaboration. In the coming days I will do some more research, organize my thoughts and add a few posts. While $125K salaries are not an option for me (nor would they be feasible for most us), The Equity Project has given me some things to think about as I reflect on the 2008-09 school year and look ahead to 2009-10.